So back in Indiana, when I had started running and lifting and all that… I realized that I’m genetically predisposed to building muscle. I should have realized this by looking at my brother.
So I quit.
Girls aren’t supposed to have lots of muscle, right?
Then I moved out to Seattle. And I got into Parkour. And suddenly I feel like a badass. (ie). I’m starting to look more like what Libby describes as “built like a brick shit house” when referring to certain individuals. I thought about worrying about it again. I’ve always been fairly comfortable with my body, but that doesn’t mean I’m up to the task of the social rammifications of continuing to go full-throttle at an activity I love.
Then, having a picnic with some fellow Monkees on Sunday, we shared a quiet moment, munching on bread and cheese and meat, looking over Freeway Park. Brandee asked, “so Willow, what’s your zombie weapon of choice?” And because I had thought this out, I didn’t need much time to explain that I would use a machete, and listed my reasons. “You?” “Shovel.” We discussed pros and cons of carrying around something so bulky. Baron pointed out a military folding shovel as his weapon of choice. “Janine?” “My hands. I just want to… rip them apart. Anything that gets in the way of movement is a danger.”
Needless to say, Janine is a badass. She is also very feminine and built like a brick shit house.
And that’s when I realized I really don’t give a shit if doing something I love makes my form non-standard for social guidelines. Because I’m going to survive the zombie apocalypse. Maybe those skinny models will, too, but mostly because there’s nothing on them to eat.
It used to confuse me, why so many people who were extrodinarily into tech and The Future were also into basic survival skills… but I think it has to do with being aware of how fucked up things are, and how fucked we might cause ourselves to be at some point.
Also, the endorphins are rad.
disclaimer: kicking zombie ass isn’t the only survival skill. Also included are cooking, gardening, mechanics, etc… all of which I’m fairly limited at. Please don’t take my joy in my skill set as devaluing your skill set. We’ll make it work together.
Muscles that you get from actually doing stuff are hot as hell!
You keep the zombies out of my garden and I’ll share the noms 😀
Muscles that you get from actually doing stuff are hot as hell!
You keep the zombies out of my garden and I’ll share the noms 😀
Muscles that you get from actually doing stuff are hot as hell!
You keep the zombies out of my garden and I’ll share the noms 😀
Muscles that you get from actually doing stuff are hot as hell!
You keep the zombies out of my garden and I’ll share the noms 😀
Muscles that you get from actually doing stuff are hot as hell!
You keep the zombies out of my garden and I’ll share the noms 😀
Muscles that you get from actually doing stuff are hot as hell!
You keep the zombies out of my garden and I’ll share the noms 😀
Muscles that you get from actually doing stuff are hot as hell!
You keep the zombies out of my garden and I’ll share the noms 😀
Muscles that you get from actually doing stuff are hot as hell!
You keep the zombies out of my garden and I’ll share the noms 😀
Muscles that you get from actually doing stuff are hot as hell!
You keep the zombies out of my garden and I’ll share the noms 😀
Muscles that you get from actually doing stuff are hot as hell!
You keep the zombies out of my garden and I’ll share the noms 😀
Muscles that you get from actually doing stuff are hot as hell!
You keep the zombies out of my garden and I’ll share the noms 😀
Muscles that you get from actually doing stuff are hot as hell!
You keep the zombies out of my garden and I’ll share the noms 😀
Muscles that you get from actually doing stuff are hot as hell!
You keep the zombies out of my garden and I’ll share the noms 😀
Muscles that you get from actually doing stuff are hot as hell!
You keep the zombies out of my garden and I’ll share the noms 😀
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Not necessarily.
It all depends on the degree of virulence of the Zombie plague, the robustness of said zombies, the preparedness of the population, and the response from government.
A fast, strong, relatively indestructible zombie (parts that continues going even when separated from the body, etc) would obviously be the worst, but even that is potentially manageable, if the incubation time for infection with zombie plague is relatively long, and/or has obvious symptoms.
I think the only scenario where you end up with total human extinction is if you have a relatively robust zombie, a rapid, insidious infection (where people can conceal they’ve been infected, travel on planes, etc), an unprepared population, and an ineffective government response.
Otherwise it’s just a matter of percentage of population lost, and the time it takes to wipe out the Zs.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.
Good shirt and nice guns. But no one is going to survive the zombie apocalypse. The struggle is only prolonging the inevitable.